Abstract: UNCTAD provides focus for
examining collective Soviet-bloc (CMEA) negotiating
behavior toward the developing countries (Group of 77) in
reponse to the initiative for a New International Economic
Order in the 1960s and 1970s. Case studies are commodities
trade and the Common Fund, the Generalized System of
Preferences, the Code of Conduct for Liner Conferences, and
the Code of Conduct for Transfer of Technology. The Soviet
bloc seeks to use UNCTAD to transform international
economic relations while conserving their place in the
existing system. CMEA–G-77 coalitions are due more to
common domestic structures of state trading than to
ideology. Their disagreements are traceable to divergent
situations within the international economy itself.
Interesting contrasts between the CMEA and the EEC as
international organizations are revealed as well. |
This full-text document is .
Contents:
- The CMEA countries and the
foundation of UNCTAD
- Group D
negotiating behavior at
UNCTAD
- International organization
and CMEA foreign trade
- Conclusion
|
| Suggested citation for
this webpage: Robert
M. Cutler, “East–South Relations at UNCTAD:
Global Political Economy and the CMEA,”
International Organization 37,
no. 1 (Winter 1983): 121–142, available at
<http://www.robertcutler.org/download/html/ar83ioz.html>, accessed 05 December 2008
Text: Copyright © MIT
Press
First Web-published: 04 November 2006 Content
last modified: 14 November 2006 For individual, non-commerical use only.
This Web-based compilation: Copyright © Robert M. Cutler 〈rmc@alum.mit.edu〉
See reprint info
if you want to reproduce anything in any medium.
This document address (URL): http://www.robertcutler.org/download/html/ar83ioz.html
Format last tweaked: 24 November 2006
|